Case 001: The System That Snapped
This case began with a disruption, but the disruption itself is already on record. What matters here is what became visible afterward.
When the original system failed, the problem was not the injury, the schedule, or the interruption. It was the assumption that the day only held value if it followed the plan. That assumption governed every reaction that followed.
Key Observations
Once the plan failed, the entire day was initially treated as compromised because the criteria for a “successful day” had not yet adapted to new conditions.
Off camera, I was emotional. Angry that the progress I had made over the past few months to establish a strong routine had fallen apart. Upset that I couldn’t wear the new outfits I had purchased after finally finding my sense of style and myself. Frustrated that I couldn’t drive.
That emotional state clouded my ability to focus on what was directly in front of me until I looked more closely.
The more I investigated, the more I started to shift my focus. The first meaningful shift occurred when value was no longer tied to recovery of the original plan. Instead of attempting to restore momentum, small, intentional decisions were made within the day as it existed. I gave myself permission to relinquish control of the day. I began to embrace the extra time in bed to reflect and to journal. I sat a little longer with my coffee while it was still warm (a rarity in the world of parenthood!) These decisions did not fix the disruption and new lack of a routine, but they did change the experience of it.
The second shift came from redirecting attention to what truly mattered. The people. The environment. Since I could no longer commute to the office, I was able to spend more 1:1 time with my family. Enjoying dinner together — one that I didn’t have to cook or clean up for. Playing games together. Not missing a moment.
With that shift came unexpected capacity for thought, for creativity, and for forward movement on work that had previously been postponed. The disruption did not eliminate progress; it redirected it. The Case Files is the proof. An idea built in my own mind, but never documented on paper… until now.
The final shift involved measurement as prior day were evaluated almost entirely by output (i.e., tasks completed at work, house cleaned at home, etc.). Under disruption, naturally the metric failed because I was sitting around 99.9% of the day. But with this shift, my day was now entirely evaluated based on quality time and connection. Time with people. Laugher. Communication that had been deferred. such as thank yous and messages of appreciation. These moments did not register under the old system, but proved essential under the new one.
Preliminary Finding
The system itself was not flawed. The flaw was the belief that life only functions under ideal conditions and that one person can do it all by themselves. The system did not require rebuilding. It required community and permission to ask for help, to wear the fancy outfit even if that meant never leaving the house, and sitting with oneself versus running away.
—-
Enjoying this case? Follow along at @oliviamjs on social